Paid family and medical leave compliance is set to become even more complex over the next three years, and employers that stay ahead of legal requirements may need to make adjustments, speakers said Wednesday during a Disability Management Employer Coalition webinar.
Statutory states require employers to have paid leave programs in place, and they represent a growing category of jurisdictions, according to the event’s hosts, Tom Foschino, vice president of accident and health at Arch Insurance Group, and Julie Lung, account manager at Arch Insurance Group.
Foschino and Lung counted 14 states that will require some form of paid leave in 2024, with Colorado joining 13 states that currently mandate leave.
By the end of 2026, 18 states will have joined the trend, including Delaware, Maine, Maryland and Minnesota.
“You can see this is really starting to catch on more and more here,” Foschino said. “There are a lot of things that you as an employer need to be looking out for when you have employees across these different states.”
In states without paid leave statutes, employers still have options if they want to offer paid leave, Lung said.
For example, short-term disability programs offered via an insurance carrier or a self-funded model can provide salary continuance in the event of an employee’s serious health condition, but such programs typically lack the family leave components present in recently adopted state paid leave laws, she noted.
State laws typically cover an employee’s own serious health condition, including injury or maternity-related conditions, but also may cover bonding after the birth, adoption or fostering of a child. These laws also increasingly cover leave taken to care for a family member with a serious health condition.
“Those three key components we see more and more as states roll out their PFML programs,” Lung said.
That may be why employers want to consider offering paid family leave in addition to a short-term disability program, especially if they seek to level benefits for employees in non-statutory states or seek to provide benefits that exceed those mandated by state laws, Lung added.
Employer plans also may contain “offset language” which specify that, for employers who live in statutory states, those laws will automatically adjust the employer’s short-term disability benefit, Lung said.
For example, an employer may have two identical employees — one in a statutory state and one in a non-statutory state — who are entitled to the same amount of gross benefits from a short-term disability plan. That plan may contain a provision that reduces the benefit that the employee in the statutory state would receive from the employer’s plan by the amount the employee receives from the state plan.
Effectively, both employees would receive the same net benefit regardless of which state they happen to work in.
“It’s important to note that what we’re looking at in a lot of these leveling examples is that we’re using the traditional [short-term disability] plan as that leveling tool to sit on top of these other plans,” Foschino said. “You need to make sure employees are not being paid more than their full-time salary.”
As a nationwide paid family and medical leave law is unlikely to pass anytime soon, it is likely to remain an issue primarily for state and local governments to debate for years to come.
Beyond leave benefits, employers may consider further support options for specific employee groups. Caregivers in the workplace, for example, may benefit from flexible leave options in the event of an emergency or from coaching and managerial support to ensure continued career growth, speakers at DMEC’s 2022 virtual conference told attendees.